J/ApJ/682/985 FIREWORKS photometry of GOODS CDF-S (Wuyts+, 2008) ================================================================================ FIREWORKS U_38_-to-24 {mu}m photometry of the GOODS Chandra Deep Field-South: multiwavelength catalog and total infrared properties of distant K_s_-selected galaxies. Wuyts S., Labbe I., Forster Schreiber N.M., Franx M., Rudnick G., Brammer G.B., Van Dokkum P.G. =2008ApJ...682..985W ================================================================================ ADC_Keywords: Galaxies, IR ; Photometry ; Redshifts ; Cross identifications ; Surveys Keywords: galaxies: distances and redshifts - galaxies: high-redshift - infrared: galaxies Abstract: We present a Ks-selected catalog, dubbed FIREWORKS, for the Chandra Deep Field-South (CDF-S) containing photometry in the U_38_, B_435_, B, V, V_606_, R, i_775_, I, z_850_, J, H, Ks, [3.6um], [4.5um], [5.8um], [8.0um], and MIPS [24um] bands. The imaging has a typical K^tot^_s,AB_ limit of 24.3mag (5{sigma}) and coverage over 113arcmin^2^ in all bands and 138arcmin^2^ in all bands but H. We cross-correlate our catalog with the 1Ms X-ray catalog by Giacconi et al. (2002, Cat. J/ApJS/139/369) and with all available spectroscopic redshifts to date. We find and explain systematic differences in a comparison with the "z_850_+Ks"-selected GOODS-MUSIC catalog (Cat. J/A+A/449/951) that covers ~90% of the field. We exploit the U_38_-to-24um photometry to determine which Ks-selected galaxies at 1.5 in Simbad) 6- 15 F10.5 pix x pixel coordinates, based on the Ks band detection map (0.15"/pix scale) 17- 26 F10.5 pix y pixel coordinates (0.15"/pix scale) 28- 37 F10.7 deg RAdeg Right ascension in decimal degree (J2000) 39- 49 F11.7 deg DEdeg Declination in decimal degree (J2000) 51- 60 F10.5 uJy FU38 ?=-99 Flux in ESO/WFI U38 band 62- 71 F10.5 uJy FB435 Flux in HST/ACS F435W band 73- 82 F10.5 uJy FB ?=-99 Flux in ESO/WFI B band 84- 93 F10.5 uJy FV ?=-99 Flux in ESO/WFI V band 95-104 F10.5 uJy FV606 Flux in HST/ACS F606W band 106-115 F10.5 uJy FRc ?=-99 Flux in ESO/WFI Rc band 117-126 F10.5 uJy Fi775 Flux in HST/ACS F775W band 128-137 F10.5 uJy FI ?=-99 Flux in ESO/WFI Ic band 139-148 F10.5 uJy Fz850 Flux in HST/ACS F850LP band 150-160 F11.5 uJy FJ Flux in VLT/ISAAC J band 162-172 F11.5 uJy FH Flux in VLT/ISAAC H band 174-183 F10.5 uJy FKs Flux in VLT/ISAAC Ks band 185-194 F10.5 uJy F3.6 Flux in Spitzer/IRAC 3.6 micron band 196-205 F10.5 uJy F4.5 Flux in Spitzer/IRAC 4.5 micron band 207-216 F10.5 uJy F5.8 Flux in Spitzer/IRAC 5.8 micron band 218-227 F10.5 uJy F8.0 Flux in Spitzer/IRAC 8.0 micron band 229-237 F9.5 uJy e_FU38 ?=-99 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FU38 239-247 F9.5 uJy e_FB435 ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FB435 249-257 F9.5 uJy e_FB ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FB 259-267 F9.5 uJy e_FV ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FV 269-277 F9.5 uJy e_FV606 ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FV606 279-287 F9.5 uJy e_FRc ?=-99 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FRc 289-297 F9.5 uJy e_Fi775 ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in Fi775 299-307 F9.5 uJy e_FI ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FI 309-317 F9.5 uJy e_Fz850 ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in Fz850 319-330 F12.5 uJy e_FJ ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FJ 332-341 F10.5 uJy e_FH ?=-99.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FH 343-349 F7.5 uJy e_FKs Uncertainty (1 sigma) in FKs 351-358 F8.5 uJy e_F3.6 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in F3.6 360-367 F8.5 uJy e_F4.5 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in F4.5 369-376 F8.5 uJy e_F5.8 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in F5.8 378-385 F8.5 uJy e_F8.0 Uncertainty (1 sigma) in F8.0 387-396 F10.5 uJy FKs.t Total Ks-band flux (aperture correction included) (1) 398-404 F7.5 uJy e_FKs.t Uncertainty associated with FKs.t 406-415 F10.5 uJy F24.t Total Spitzer/MIPS 24 micron flux (2) 417-424 F8.5 uJy e_F24.t Uncertainty associated with F24.t 426-432 F7.5 --- w_FU38 Effective weight in U_38_ band, normalized to the median effective weight in that band 434-440 F7.5 --- w_FB435 Effective weight in B_435_ band 442-449 F8.5 --- w_FB Effective weight in B band 451-458 F8.5 --- w_FV Effective weight in V band 460-466 F7.5 --- w_FV606 Effective weight in V_606_ band 468-475 F8.5 --- w_FRc Effective weight in Rc band 477-483 F7.5 --- w_Fi775 Effective weight in i_775_ band 485-492 F8.5 --- w_FI Effective weight in I band 494-500 F7.5 --- w_Fz850 Effective weight in z_850_ band 502-509 F8.5 --- w_FJ Effective weight in J band 511-518 F8.5 --- w_FH Effective weight in H band 520-526 F7.5 --- w_FKs Effective weight in Ks band 528-534 F7.5 --- w_F3.6 Effective weight in 3.6um band 536-542 F7.5 --- w_F4.5 Effective weight in 4.5um band 544-550 F7.5 --- w_F5.8 Effective weight in 5.8um band 552-558 F7.5 --- w_F8.0 Effective weight in 8.0um band 560-566 F7.5 arcsec aper Aperture diameter within Ks flux (3) 568-575 F8.5 arcsec diam Aperture diameter used for measuring the total Ks band flux (4) 577 I1 --- fl1 [0,1] SExtractor's "blend" (1 when the source was deblended somewhere in the process) 579 I1 --- fl2 [0,1] SExtractor's "bias" (1 when the photometry is affected by a neighboring source) 581-588 F8.5 arcsec Kr50 Half light radius measured on the Ks-band image 590-596 F7.5 --- Keps Ellipticity of the isophotal area, measured on the Ks-band image 598-602 F5.1 deg PA [-90,90] Position angle of the isophotal area, measured on the Ks-band image 604-606 I3 --- XID [12,647]?=-99 Identification number from the 1Ms X-ray catalog (5) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Approximate total fluxes in other bandpasses can be computed by F[band]_t_=F[band]xFKs_t_/FKs), provided that there are no large morphological k-corrections. Note (2): measured within a 6" diameter circular aperture and then aperture corrected (See section 4.2.2 for further details). Note (3): In cases where the color aperture was the isophotal aperture defined by the surface brightness threshold of {mu}(K_s,AB_)=24.6mag/arcsec^2^, aper is the diameter in arcseconds of a circular aperture with equal area. Note (4): When the isophotal or SExtractor's MAG_AUTO aperture was used, this entry contains the equivalent circularized diameter corresponding to that aperture. Note (5): -99 when no cross identification within 2" was found. Note that we accounted for the ~1.3" systematic offset in the 1Ms catalog (Giacconi et al., 2002, Cat. J/ApJS/139/369, <[GZW2002] XID NNN> in Simbad), X-ray centroids, as pointed out before by Roche et al., 2003MNRAS.346..803R). -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: redshift.dat -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 4 I4 --- Seq ID number (<[WLF2008b] NNNN> in Simbad) 6- 14 F9.5 --- zph ?=-99 Best estimate of the photometric redshift (sect. 5.2). 16- 24 F9.5 --- zph0 ?=-99 Lower edge of the 68% confidence interval around zphB 26- 34 F9.5 --- zph1 ?=-99 Upper edge of the 68% confidence interval around zphB 36- 44 F9.5 --- zsp ?=-99.9 Spectroscopic redshift 46- 48 F3.1 --- q_zsp ?=0 Quality flag from 0 to 1 assigned to zsp. (1) 50- 52 I3 --- r_zsp ?=-99 Spectroscopic survey from which zsp was taken (2) 54- 58 A5 --- q.zsp ?=0 Original quality flag from the respective spectroscopic survey -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Only q_zsp=1.0 entries are considered reliable. Note (2): References as follows: 1 = FORS2 (v3.0; Vanzella et al., 2008, Cat. J/A+A/478/83) 2 = K20 (Mignoli et al., 2005, Cat. J/A+A/437/883) 3 = VVDS (v1.0, Le Fevre et al., 2004, Cat. J/A+A/428/1043) 4 = CXO (Szokoly et al., 2004, Cat. J/ApJS/155/271) 5 = Norman et al., 2002ApJ...571..218N 6 = Croom et al., 2001, Cat. J/MNRAS/328/150 7 = van der Wel et al., 2005ApJ...631..145V 8 = Cristiani et al., 2000A&A...359..489C 9 = Strolger et al., 2004, Cat. J/ApJ/613/200 10 = Daddi et al., 2004ApJ...617..746D 11 = IMAGES (Ravikumar et al., 2007, Cat. J/A+A/465/1099) 12 = LCIRS (Doherty et al., 2005, Cat. J/A+A/449/951) 13 = Wuyts et al. (2008, in preparation) 14 = Kriek et al. (2008ApJ...677..219K) 15 = Roche et al. (2006MNRAS.370...74R) 16 = Huang et al. (2008, in preparation) 17 = VIMOS (v1.0, Popesso et al., 2009A&A...494..443P) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- History: Copied at http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/fireworks/ ================================================================================ (End) Emmanuelle Perret [CDS] 18-Nov-2010